Some of the more recent posts have commented about the biased nature of this site relative to other news.
Most people recognize that all news is biased — to think otherwise is a bit naive. Just read the Star, Sun, Globe and Post and you will quickly see their leanings or spin on things. More/less environmental, pro/anti gun control, supporting one political party over another — they are all skewed to varying degrees. That is the very nature of people and Editorial Policies. That is also the beauty of social media.
No matter what the potential skew of the vehicle/blog — any and all points can be raised and presented by the reader through their comments. That is how unbiased discussion takes place. It is the responsibility of the reader, not the vehicle.
The fact that people feel this site is negative says something. People who are engaged and interested in town are angry. They are commenting. Does it represent the general feelings of the community — we don’t know, but it makes one wonder.
The opposite point of view doesn’t seem to be as interested in making their case. Maybe they aren’t interested enough. We don’t know. Both sides of any issue are published. All comments published are without editing (Blogger does not allow editing of comments). Comments which are purely lashing out at other contributors are simply rejected.
For those readers who’s commentary thus far has been to criticise the criticizers — we encourage your continued participation. Clearly we don’t vet the comments — otherwise yours would not have been published. We love to hear your point of view.
The real value of social media is the ability for everyone to take the opportunity to communicate their views — as many have done. Could we do better? Could this site offer a more balanced point of view? That’s up to the readers — it’s not up to the site.
The opportunity in always there for you to take. Will your take it?
Use the envelope and pencil icons immediately below to forward this post to friends or leave a comment.


