Aurora Citizen

News & Views from the Citizens of Aurora Ontario

Archive for the ‘Town Council’ Category

When Is An Invitation Not An Invitation?

Posted by auroracitizen on May 11, 2009

Have you ever had a party where you felt obligated to invite someone even though you didn’t want them to come? How did you manage that?

One way is to send the invitation so late that they have no opportunity to re-arrange their schedule to make the party.

Mayor Morris has invited various user groups and interested stakeholders in the senior ball diamond to a meeting scheduled for Monday May 11 (tonight).

In the email she states,

“In an effort to bring all parties together – and to get all the facts on the table – I am proposing to host ” one meeting ” rather than lots of one – on-ones on the same topic. It is hoped that as many members as possible will try to attend.”

The problem is that the email was sent last night at 5:59 PM — leaving folks with the difficult task to change their plans for tonight with very little notice.

Short notice equals poor attendance. For an issue of such importance — that has been in discussion for over 1 year — shouldn’t this meeting have been published further in advance.

What is your opinion about a Senior Ball Diamond?

Use the envelope and pencil icons immediately below to forward this post to friends or leave a comment.

Posted in Recreation, Special Meetings, Town Council | 43 Comments »

Ethical Emails

Posted by auroracitizen on May 9, 2009

Adam Giambrone recently found himself in hot water for an inappropriate email he set to Councillor Cesar Palacio. Giambrone has subsequently apologized to that Councillor, Council and his community.

Of note, this infraction has come to the attention of the City’s Integrity Commissioner when the offended Councillor asked for a ruling on whether the email had crossed the line and qualified as inappropriate conduct according to the Council’s Code of Conduct.

We have heard a lot about Council’s conduct here in Aurora. As well we have heard about inappropriate emails sent from Council members to other Council members. However, these accusations have not been supported by much factual evidence. Are not emails supposed to be part of public record?

It will be interesting to see how the City of Toronto handles this situation. It will be equally interesting to see how our own Council handles a similar matter. The comparison should be enlightening.

Use the envelope and pencil icons immediately below to forward this post to friends or leave a comment.

Posted in Town Council | 14 Comments »

What does an Ethics Commissioner Do?

Posted by auroracitizen on April 30, 2009

We read with interest the recent article in the Banner where David Nitkin, our new Ethics Commissioner, is quoted as saying he was not there to enforce the rules. He stated, “I am not here as a policeman, but as an educator and facilitator.”

But what does that really mean?

He recommended that no fees were to be charged to the public, that he remain autonomous and that he have a dedicated phone line. He would also only delegate when asked by Council.

Council approved that he will act independently, but no mention of fees to the public. And if they don’t ask for a delegation on a topic, how does the public know what is happening?

Plus any town board or committee is exempt from his mandate.

Since he sees himself as an educator versus policeman will he just make suggestions which Council can ignore and the public never finds out. Or will he make written recommendations to Council?

The Mayor indicated that Aurora has stepped up to the plate. Hopefully Council will also step up and communicate how the Ethics Commissioner will work. What the process is for public complaint and how the public will be kept apprised of his activities. Or will this be just a tool to be used as they see fit on issues they see worthy.

Time will tell, so be sure and let them know what you think.

Use the envelope and pencil icons immediately below to forward this post to friends or leave a comment.

Posted in Code of Ethics, Community Input, Town Council | 39 Comments »

The Role of Council

Posted by auroracitizen on April 19, 2009

There has been a spirited discussion on the topic of Who Do Councillors Work For, so we wanted to broaden the discussion by adding a couple more thoughts. We originally broached this subject with a post about Council versus Staff Roles back in Sept 2008.

One of the issues seen with this Council is their determination to get involved in the daily running of the business of the Town. By definition this is the role of staff and is in fact a Managerial role — not a leadership role.

Managers focus on adherence to rules and systems and policies. While leaders are about providing vision and delegating and empowering people to be better.

The reality is people who get involved in the day to day activities of their teams do so because they are comfortable there and uncomfortable at the hard task of delegating and empowering through policies.

The current Council seems focused on the day to day work. They have demonstrated a lack of trust in their team by constantly challenging (in a non-productive manner) staff recommendations and sending them back to be re-written the way Council wants them. This is the very definition of poor leadership.

In the business world we know that people don’t quit companies — they quit leaders.

In the political world, people don’t quit leaders — they just keep their head down and wait for a new leader. Effectively they quit their job, but don’t leave so we the taxpayers keep paying their salaries.

Unmotivated staff don’t do a very good job, but you don’t fault the staff for this. It is always the leadership.

This Council needs to get out of the daily details and start letting staff run things based on the policies set by Council. Since this Council has effectively replaced the entire senior team this term, we should expect to see less micro-managing and more visioning/policy setting in the balance of the term.

After all, we should have every expectation that they hired people they have confidence can do their jobs and be willing to let them. Time will tell.

What do you think?

Use the envelope and pencil icons immediately below to forward this post to friends or leave a comment.

Posted in Town Council | 4 Comments »

Who Do Councillors Work For?

Posted by auroracitizen on April 11, 2009

One of our readers raised an interesting issue. They were enquiring about the letter written by Councillor MacEachern to the opposing side of a lawsuit against the Town. They felt that Councillor MacEacheren had provided information in that letter that helped the opposing case.

What do you have to say about the email MacEachern sent to the opposing side in a lawsuit. It’s been made public. I think it’s a common business practice that when someone is suing you, you should NOT send them information to help them. Let’s not elect someone who clearly DOES NOT act in the Town’s best interests. Does anyone know the decision in that case anyway?

This raises the question of whether your own beliefs take precedence over the citizens you have been elected to represent?

If you have clearly spelled out your position on a specific issue, then elected officials should follow their commitments.

However, if the issue has not been clearly spelled out as one of your campaign principles, then how should you act? Should you act to the detriment of the community, or hold your tongue. Interesting?

How does this type of conduct align with the Code of Ethics? How does this align with acting as a united Council once a decision has been reached.

It would appear that Councillor MacEachern has acted on her own — contrary to the best interest of the community, against the position of Council on behalf of the community and possible contrary to the Code of Ethics.

Readers should be interested in understanding what this issue was about and how it has resolved itself. Both the lawsuit against the Town and Councillor MacEachern’s conduct.

Readers should also be interested to know what steps Council took in response to Councillor MacEachern’s conduct. After all, Council/Councillors should work for the community as our representative, not their own special interests.

Use the envelope and pencil icons immediately below to forward this post to friends or leave a comment.

Posted in Code of Ethics, Town Council | 41 Comments »

Council Expenses: What are we getting in return?

Posted by auroracitizen on March 15, 2009

It was good to see that Council is not using their full expense allowance — in fact they have voted to reduce the allowance for the coming budget year.

However, it was interesting to note that the bulk of the expenses submitted were for attending conferences. One must wonder what value the town receives from having Councillors attend these events. It has been a trend that seems to have come into vogue this term. An examination of past terms would indicate that generally Councillors did not attend these events — yet in 2008, in addition to the Mayor, Councillors McRoberts, Granger, Wilson, Gallo all attended. Why?

And why are Councillors McRoberts and Gallo attending in 2009? Why can’t the Mayor attend on behalf of Council and report back any new learning that is appropriate?

Private sector business is cancelling travel, meetings and conferences, yet our politicians are still attending. It would be interesting to know what value was received by the town for these expenses. Or is this a perk of office for their own personal development? What do you think?

Use the envelope and pencil icons immediately below to forward this post to friends or leave a comment.

Posted in Budget, Town Council | 9 Comments »

Street Lights on Wellington

Posted by auroracitizen on March 3, 2009

Driving along Wellington from the 404, check out the street lamps. Initially all the street lamps were a “heritage” design. These were probably chosen because this stretch is referred to as the gateway to Aurora and they added to the overall look of this gateway.

However, now dotted through these “heritage” models are the modern version — so as one travels into Aurora they are treated to 2 different types of light standards.

What happened? This is probably a Regional road, but is there not some agreed design standard between the Town and the Region that provides for a consistent look? What is Council’s role to ensure that design standards are met?

Frankly, it looks awful. Not consistent with the “hip, upscale and well-educated” community Council promotes.

Next time you are driving through — check it out. Let your local Councillor or Mayor know if you agree.

Use the envelope and pencil icons immediately below to forward this post to friends or leave a comment.

Posted in Town Council, Traffic/Parking | 4 Comments »

Positive Image Important for Aurora

Posted by auroracitizen on February 28, 2009

In her weekly column in The Auroran, Mayor Morris states, “A positive Town image helps us to protect and enhance the financial investment we each made in our homes and businesses. A positive image also helps keep us competitive.”

She may consider it great that the New York Times thinks we are “hip, upscale and well-educated”. But what do they actually know know about Aurora (maybe they are confusing us with Aurora Illinois, or Aurora Colorado) and what was their criteria for this conclusion. More importantly, these writers don’t live, work or vote in Aurora, so how informed is their opinion.

She should be more concerned about how the community and local businesses views itself. 680 NEWS has reported at least a couple times this term about how dysfunctional the Council is.

Having a positive image is great, as long as it is for the right things. Characteristics such as well-run, fiscally responsible, open and transparent, community driven. When we can all agree that these are happening in Aurora, maybe folks closer to home will have a positive image.

It is great to see public consultation is underway. Let’s hope there is poltical will to listen and act accordingly.

Use the envelope and pencil icons immediately below to forward this post to friends or leave a comment.

Posted in Town Council | 9 Comments »

Frustrated, Aurora Annie talks politics

Posted by auroracitizen on February 28, 2009

Dick Illingworth has long been a student of politics in this community. He has served and contributed to this community longer than many have lived here. He has recently been away from his regular role because of illness, but we are so glad to see him back. Agree or disagree, Dick is passionate about this town.

Following is a column by Dick Illingworth reprinted in its entirety from the Auroran. As always, Dick raises a number of issues worthy of discussion. We thought readers may wish to comment.

————————————————————————–

“Where have you been my Dickie-Boy, my Dickie-Boy, where have you been, my Dickie-Boy?” Aurora Annie sang as I approached her hidden burrow beside the Community Arboretum pathway, just west of the Town Hall.

“I was waiting to give you my traditional annual report on Groundhog Day about affairs in Aurora and the region but understand you were taking a rest at the Southlake Regional Health Centre Resort.”

“Okay, Annie, let’s have it, what have you heard from the closed sessions of Aurora Council and what’s the latest from the region,” I asked. “I’d love to tell you what I heard.

Councillors say and do behind those closed doors as I have in the past but I can’t as those celebrity groundhogs Wiarton Willie and Punxsutawaney Phil forced through a Code of Conduct for the members of the Groundhog Day Association, but my women’s intuition tells me we’re in trouble.

“During this term of office a valued member of council, Grace Marsh, resigned, which is very unusual for an elected member of council.

“Then all department heads except the Director of Leisure Services resigned or retired and worst of all, the Chief Administrative Officer was dismissed for unknown reasons.

“John Rogers was an excellent choice for the CAO as he was a lawyer by profession, served as Mayor of Georgina and CAO of East Gwillimbury before coming to Aurora. He was also active in many community organizations and agencies,” Annie continued. “Then there was the disbandment of the Special Events Committee under questionable circumstances which have never been made known and this was the council that promised open and transparent government.

“This council has held more in-camera meetings than possibly any council in the history of the municipality and very few issues discussed or decisions made are ratified in open session or, if so, with no details.

“Before that the Yonge Street Sub-Committee which introduced the Farmer’s Market was also disbanded with no reasons given,” Annie said. “Citizens should be up in arms as delegations at council meetings or asking questions at Open Forum and demanding answers. Where are the active ratepayer groups of the old days or have citizens just given up in disgust?” Annie asked.

“You get the government you deserve by the way you vote, but this is getting ridiculous!” she shouted in anger.

“Another thing that makes me mad is the members of regional council don’t seem to care what happens to taxpayers’ money. Just recently at a Transportation and Works Committee meeting when additional funds of approximately 30 per cent were requested for projects running above budget and this is a common occurrence,” Annie said. “It would seem that some of the new commissioners are having problems keeping projects on budget. I think I mentioned it to you before about the number of senior regional staff who have left the region to seek other employment with two coming to Aurora with no questions asked by the sheep-like regional councillors.

“At a time when the country and local municipalities, including the region, are in turbulent economic times and require belt tightening, the region was considering a $1 billion capital budget. Don’t council members think of the taxpayer once in a while?” Annie asked.
Before I had a chance to comment, Annie pointed out that over the years it was said that in order to attract better politicians at all levels of government, it was necessary to pay a decent salary.

“The public is now paying a decent level of salary, but the majority of politicians are just feeding at the public trough,” she argued.

“The public deserves better behaviour from its politicians,” she said, “and to steal your old tag line, ‘That’s the way I see it, I’m Aurora Annie.’”

Use the envelope and pencil icons immediately below to forward this post to friends or leave a comment.

Posted in Guest Post, Town Council | 2 Comments »

Is anyone else concerned about how long it is taking to get budgets approved?

Posted by auroracitizen on February 12, 2009

It is already mid February and still no budget approval. What additional information does Council have today that they didn’t have 2 months ago, or 4 months ago? This process should have been started in October, not in January.

Previous Councils have managed to approved budgets early in the year when their decisions could impact the spending for the year. What is keeping this Council from doing the same? Is this a symptom of the significant staff turnover?

It’s hard to find savings when the budget is being spent before the decisions are made and new decisions are too late to impact existing commitments. Alternatively, new projects are not started or optimal pricing is not secured because we are late tendering projects. In tendering, the early projects get the most competitive bids. The later you wait, the less aggressive the tenders are.

Could you imagine doing your personal budgeting after the expenditures have been made? Those who do, usually end up in credit card debt. Hopefully Aurora is not travelling down the same path.

Use the envelope and pencil icons immediately below to forward this post to friends or leave a comment.

Posted in Staff Turnover, Town Council | 20 Comments »