<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is She Really Serious?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://auroracitizen.ca/2012/05/09/is-she-really-serious/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://auroracitizen.ca/2012/05/09/is-she-really-serious/</link>
	<description>News &#38; Views from the Citizens of Aurora Ontario</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 15:03:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelli</title>
		<link>http://auroracitizen.ca/2012/05/09/is-she-really-serious/#comment-12211</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 12:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://auroracitizen.ca/?p=3027#comment-12211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[not me - I&#039;m the one who posts about the Lawn Bowling Club -]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not me &#8211; I&#8217;m the one who posts about the Lawn Bowling Club -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://auroracitizen.ca/2012/05/09/is-she-really-serious/#comment-12209</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 02:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://auroracitizen.ca/?p=3027#comment-12209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Relocate her to the Farmers&#039; Market.

She could be the jam lady&#039;s executive assistant. 

Let her conduct be their burden.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Relocate her to the Farmers&#8217; Market.</p>
<p>She could be the jam lady&#8217;s executive assistant. </p>
<p>Let her conduct be their burden.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://auroracitizen.ca/2012/05/09/is-she-really-serious/#comment-12208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 00:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://auroracitizen.ca/?p=3027#comment-12208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot; Chortles &quot; Actually no one calls it the Cultural Centre, not even the Heritage Center. It is just referred to a &quot; The Center &#039; allowing the other individual to fill in the blank. Often with an expletive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; Chortles &#8221; Actually no one calls it the Cultural Centre, not even the Heritage Center. It is just referred to a &#8221; The Center &#8216; allowing the other individual to fill in the blank. Often with an expletive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://auroracitizen.ca/2012/05/09/is-she-really-serious/#comment-12206</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 18:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://auroracitizen.ca/?p=3027#comment-12206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isn&#039;t it interesting that she voted for a so-called code of conduct (to apply only to others of course) and yet continues with her hissy, obstructive and infantile behaviour at just about every council meeting without consequence?
If it were up to me I would certainly tell her to do her job or take a hike! What happened to the &quot;you have to fall in line with majority decisions made by council&quot; dictate from the previous council that she was a part of? Once again I guess the principle applies only to some and not to others.
I wish someone would shut her down once and for all at these meetings... although, having said that, she is always reason for a good laugh.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it interesting that she voted for a so-called code of conduct (to apply only to others of course) and yet continues with her hissy, obstructive and infantile behaviour at just about every council meeting without consequence?<br />
If it were up to me I would certainly tell her to do her job or take a hike! What happened to the &#8220;you have to fall in line with majority decisions made by council&#8221; dictate from the previous council that she was a part of? Once again I guess the principle applies only to some and not to others.<br />
I wish someone would shut her down once and for all at these meetings&#8230; although, having said that, she is always reason for a good laugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://auroracitizen.ca/2012/05/09/is-she-really-serious/#comment-12205</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 17:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://auroracitizen.ca/?p=3027#comment-12205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wish to commend Councillor Gaertner - for her consistency. I always know where she is coming from &amp; where she is going. The trick is to pay no attention whatsoever to the means she employs to reach her destination. That way could lead to madness.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish to commend Councillor Gaertner &#8211; for her consistency. I always know where she is coming from &amp; where she is going. The trick is to pay no attention whatsoever to the means she employs to reach her destination. That way could lead to madness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://auroracitizen.ca/2012/05/09/is-she-really-serious/#comment-12204</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 16:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://auroracitizen.ca/?p=3027#comment-12204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I refuse to call her Councillor because...&quot;

Are you also the one with the silly habit of deliberately calling the Cultural Centre the &#039;Heritage Centre&#039;? *chortles*]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I refuse to call her Councillor because&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Are you also the one with the silly habit of deliberately calling the Cultural Centre the &#8216;Heritage Centre&#8217;? *chortles*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://auroracitizen.ca/2012/05/09/is-she-really-serious/#comment-12201</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 15:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://auroracitizen.ca/?p=3027#comment-12201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wendy Gaertner seems to have escaped from a Grimm Brothers tale or equivalent or possibly from &quot;Through the Looking Glass.&quot;

Most of the time she makes no sense, even when she has a written script in front of her.

Councillors are able to miss Council meetings due to reasons or health or a dramatic family crisis and this would be fully understood by one&#039;s fellows.

But Wendy is usually mentally absent even when she is physically present. This should not be tolerated. The annual councillor&#039;s salary, divided by the number of meetings per year to arrive at a salary per meeting should be deducted from her whenever her mind goes walk-about. If this were done she might end up costing taxpayers very little.

Her contribution to the town&#039;s business is comparable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wendy Gaertner seems to have escaped from a Grimm Brothers tale or equivalent or possibly from &#8220;Through the Looking Glass.&#8221;</p>
<p>Most of the time she makes no sense, even when she has a written script in front of her.</p>
<p>Councillors are able to miss Council meetings due to reasons or health or a dramatic family crisis and this would be fully understood by one&#8217;s fellows.</p>
<p>But Wendy is usually mentally absent even when she is physically present. This should not be tolerated. The annual councillor&#8217;s salary, divided by the number of meetings per year to arrive at a salary per meeting should be deducted from her whenever her mind goes walk-about. If this were done she might end up costing taxpayers very little.</p>
<p>Her contribution to the town&#8217;s business is comparable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
